I wonder if that USD 500 difference, which is not that huge after all, justifies going with the Mini and its new M2 chip instead of the Studio. ![]() Rather, I'm wondering if the new Mini will be plenty for my normal editing work in Resolve, including editing, color grading and some FX (I'm not a power user of Fusion by any means, but hope to learn more), as well as sound and exporting. So I'm really not looking for rants about Apple's evil strategies to make us spend money or advice about adventurous paths to build my own PC rig. I don't buy into any computer-brand sects (these are only tools after all), but have been a Mac user for years and am not about to change platforms. Most notably, the Studio would have 32-core CPU as opposed to 19-Core GPU in the Mini. ![]() ![]() Also, the Mini would have 32GB RAM instead of 64GB. In the case of the Studio, I had decided to go with the intermediate configuration with upgrades, as follows:Īpple M1 Max with 10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 16-core Neural Engineįront: Two USB-C ports, one SDXC card slotīack: Four Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-A ports, one HDMI port, one 10Gb Ethernet port, one 3.5 mm headphone jack.Īs far as ports go, the Mini loses the 2 front USB-C ports and the SDXC card reader (which I have both as a peripheral and in my BenQ monitor). My M2 Mac Mini configuration would be as follows:Īpple M2 Pro with 12‑core CPU, 19-core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engineįour Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI port, two USB‑A ports, headphone jack Now Apple announces the new M2 MacMini and I wonder if I should reconsider my decision. My mind was set on buying a new Mac Studio at the beginning of 2023, but I haven't made the purchase yet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |